BOULDING IN PUBLIC POLICY: ALL RECEIVE

24 important questions on BOULDING IN PUBLIC POLICY: ALL RECEIVE

What is the approach to social welfare as indicated in the text?

The approach to social welfare can be characterized by:
  1. Setting a modest table for universal access
  2. A high table for the deserving individuals
  3. Being more generous and less conditional than other systems
  4. Aiming for broad inclusivity while recognizing varying needs.

What are the historical distinctions in welfare state provisions based on deservingness?

Throughout history, notable distinctions include:
  1. Deserving groups: The old, sick, and disabled who receive more generous and less conditional social welfare.
  2. Less deserving groups: The able-bodied unemployed who don’t always receive the same level of welfare support.
  3. Welfare efforts exist to support all groups, including minimum income protection schemes to uphold a dignified living standard.
  4. General historical pattern remains consistent despite variations in policy across different countries and times.

How did poor laws differentiate between the deserving and undeserving poor?

Poor laws created stark contrasts:
  1. Deserving poor: The impotent poor (old, sick, disabled) received alms and care in charitable poorhouses or through outdoor relief.
  2. Undeserving poor: The able-bodied poor faced restrictions such as being sent to workhouses or banished from communities.
  3. This distinction influenced early welfare systems and persists in modern social welfare discussions.
  • Higher grades + faster learning
  • Never study anything twice
  • 100% sure, 100% understanding
Discover Study Smart

What historical events contributed to the establishment of modern welfare states?

Key developments in the modern welfare state include:
  1. Chancellor Bismarck's introduction of social insurance in the German empire aimed at mitigating socialism's threat.
  2. Earlier European countries had already established public systems of poor relief before Bismarck.
  3. The distinction of deservingness continued through the introduction of various social insurance schemes over time.

How did the categories of deserving and undeserving poor influence social insurance development?

The development of social insurance reflected historical distinctions with:
  1. Targeting of the old, sick, and disabled as priority groups for social insurance initiatives.
  2. Delayed introduction of unemployment insurance compared to social insurance for those deemed deserving.
  3. The ongoing relevance of the deservingness distinction witnessed throughout the evolution of welfare policies.

Who is the author of the book with ISBN 9781839101892?

The author of the book is Tijs Laenen. He has contributed significant work to the field. The book itself is part of a broader collection released under various ISBN numbers.

When was the book downloaded from PubFactory?

The book was downloaded on 10/10/2022 at 07:07:51 AM. This timestamp indicates the specific moment of access, highlighting the digital nature of the publication.

What is the ISBN of the book associated with Tijs Laenen's work?

The ISBN associated with Tijs Laenen's work is 9781839101892. This number is crucial for identifying the book among numerous publications and ensures accurate referencing.

On what date was the document last modified?

The document was last modified on 26/06/2020 at 09:19. This information reflects the last update of the digital file, which is essential for version control.

What has been observed regarding social assistance for the elderly and disabled compared to the able-bodied unemployed?

Social assistance tends to favor specific groups, illustrated by:
  • Elderly and disabled often receiving care before the unemployed
  • Legitimacy is associated with those seen as deserving
  • Unemployed often last to receive assistance
  • Global trends show similar patterns, predominantly in the Global South

What types of indicators are used to measure welfare generosity in welfare state literature?

Three primary types of policy indicators highlight welfare generosity:
  1. Social expenditure
  2. Social rights
  3. Benefit recipiency
  • Each indicator has unique strengths and weaknesses
  • Indicators consistently suggest more generous support for the old, sick, and disabled

How do social expenditure patterns reflect on the generosity of welfare systems for different groups?

Patterns show disparities in spending, demonstrating that:
  • Most countries allocate more resources to old-age pensions and healthcare
  • Spending on unemployment benefits and social assistance is considerably less
  • This finding holds true even when adjusting for structural needs

What is Esping-Andersen's de-commodification index and its significance?

This index is a measure of the extent to which social welfare entitlements allow citizens to live independently of market forces. Key findings include:
  • Old-age pensions provide the highest de-commodification.
  • Sick pay ranks next, followed by unemployment benefits.
  • Similar results were found by Scruggs and James.

How do different social assistance schemes compare in terms of benefit rates and means tests?

Categorical social assistance schemes for the old or disabled generally offer:
  • Higher benefit rates than general social assistance.
  • Less stringent means tests.
  • This contrasts with schemes for able-bodied, working-age populations.

What are the criticisms of the social rights approach to welfare generosity?

Critics argue that this approach often:
  • Assumes formal law reflects real policy practices.
  • Indicates a discrepancy between paper reality and social reality.
  • Leads researchers to explore benefit recipiency data for deeper understanding.

What does van Oorschot's analysis reveal about welfare benefits across different groups?

His findings based on EU-SILC data show that:
  • Older-age benefits are typically the highest.
  • Health-related benefits, including sick pay, come next.
  • Unemployment benefits are lower than both categories.
  • Social assistance benefits usually offer the least amounts.

What characterized the periods of welfare expansion and retrenchment?

The transition involved:
  • A 'golden age' of welfare expansion with near full employment.
  • Followed by a 'silver age' marked by permanent austerity.
  • Structural pressures such as chronic unemployment and population ageing emerged.

What is indicated by systematic studies on welfare retrenchment regarding the impacts on different demographics?

Evidence suggests that:
  • Austerity measures have chiefly impacted the able-bodied unemployed.
  • Old, sick, and disabled have experienced retrenchment but less severe.
  • Unemployment benefits faced more cutbacks compared to old-age pensions.
  • Studies by Green-Pedersen (2001, 2002) support this trend in Denmark and the Netherlands.

What is the significance of the date 10/10/2022 in relation to Tijs Laenen's work?

The date represents when the document associated with Tijs Laenen, ISBN 9781839101892, was downloaded from PubFactory. Key points include:
  • Downloaded via free access
  • Identifier shows it’s a unique publication
  • Reflects accessibility for users

What does the term 'activation turn' signify in the context of welfare state history?

This term indicates a significant shift in welfare states focusing on:
  • Moving from passive social protection to active labour market participation.
  • Transformation from a safety net offering income security to a trampoline towards (re-)employment.
  • Recognition that activation has multiple forms, yet typically categorizes as 'enabling' or 'demanding' policies.
  • Highlighting the focus predominantly on the able-bodied unemployed for policy implementation.

What are the two broad categories of activation policies according to scholarly agreement?

Activation policies can be categorized into:
1. 'Enabling' activation:
  • Focuses on enhancing human capital and employability.
  • - Generally involves voluntary participation in public employment services and training programs.
2. 'Demanding' activation:
  • Enforces work-related obligations on benefit recipients.
  • - Aims to push individuals towards prompt employment.

How has the focus of activation policies changed over the past decades?

Over recent decades, there has been a noticeable shift towards:
  • Increased focus on the able-bodied unemployed.
  • Exponential rise in strictness of work-related obligations linked to benefits.
  • Requirement to accept jobs below previous educational or pay levels.
  • Documentation of job-seeking activities and compliance with various other obligations.

What recent trends have occurred in sickness and disability schemes regarding welfare conditionality?

In recent years, there has been:
  • An increase in welfare conditionality in sickness and disability schemes.
  • Notable alignment with unemployment and social assistance benefits.
  • Recognition of the urgency in applying similar obligations in these schemes as seen with unemployment benefits.

What trends are being observed regarding activation policies and certain demographic groups?

  • Activation policies increasingly target the sick and partially disabled.
  • These groups are often exempt from demanding work obligations.
  • The fully disabled and the elderly are generally excluded from activation policies.
  • Retirement age raises or pension deferment can be seen as activation, but pensioners are not required to perform work.
  • Arguments against work requirements for pensioners relate to their deservingness and past contributions.

The question on the page originate from the summary of the following study material:

  • A unique study and practice tool
  • Never study anything twice again
  • Get the grades you hope for
  • 100% sure, 100% understanding
Remember faster, study better. Scientifically proven.
Trustpilot Logo