Home / Summaries / (2.3): The Nature vs Nurture Debate / social-sociologists-gender

The Nature vs Nurture Debate

5 important questions on The Nature vs Nurture Debate

What do sociologists like Desmond Morris argue about biology and culture?

Sociologists such as Desmond Morris (1968) argue that biology shapes culture because sharing culture is based on the inbuilt or genetic need to continue the life of the social group over time. They believe that gender roles are biologically determined and affect behavior.

How do sociologists view the concept of social constructs?

Sociologists argue that many aspects of social life are social constructs, meaning they are not biologically determined but are produced by society. They believe social behavior is shaped by the social environment and experiences rather than biology or genetics.

What is Cordelia Fine's argument regarding neuroscience and gender roles?

Cordelia Fine (2011) argues that neuroscience is a patriarchal ideology used to justify gender inequality, such as the pay gap and exclusion of females from certain sectors. She criticizes neurological approaches to gender roles for reinforcing stereotypes without evidence.

What is the nature versus nurture debate according to the key terms?

The nature versus nurture debate is about whether human behavior is the product of innate biological influences such as instinct or genetics, or whether it is the product of environmental influences such as social upbringing or the process of socialisation.

How do sociologists view the influence of nurture in socialisation?

Sociologists highlight the influence of nurture, believing that the social environment in which socialisation occurs is more important than biological or genetic factors. They reject the idea that nature is responsible for social behavior.

The question on the page originate from the summary of the following study material:

(2.3): The Nature vs Nurture Debate

View summary