Corporate social responsibility and competitive advantage - flammer c 2013

19 important questions on Corporate social responsibility and competitive advantage - flammer c 2013

What does this study investigate concerning shareholders and corporations' environmental footprints?

This research examines how shareholders react to corporations' environmental behavior:
  • Companies with responsible environmental actions see significant stock price increases.
  • Firms with eco-harmful behavior face stock price declines.
  • The study also explores internal and external factors that influence these reactions.

How do external pressures affect shareholder reactions to corporate environmental behavior?

Increased external pressures have led to:
  1. Greater penalties for eco-harmful actions.
  2. Decreased rewards for eco-friendly initiatives.
  3. An overall trend toward higher environmental consciousness among stakeholders, influencing corporate behavior.
  4. More stringent regulations and heightened media scrutiny contribute to these pressures.

What implications do the study's findings have for corporate management?

  • Strategy & Governance
    Shareholders value eco-friendly behavior, so managers and boards should design and implement strong environmental CSR policies as part of their long-term strategy.
  • Innovation & R&D
    Investments in green innovation and R&D can enhance environmental performance and create shareholder value.
  • Decision-Making in Management
    Since both eco-friendly and eco-harmful strategies significantly affect shareholders, environmental considerations should be explicitly integrated into managerial decision-making.
  • Policy & Regulation
    Legislators and shareholders share similar environmental concerns. Better coordination between policymakers and companies could improve the effectiveness of environmental regulations.
  • Higher grades + faster learning
  • Never study anything twice
  • 100% sure, 100% understanding
Discover Study Smart

What limitations are noted in this study's findings?

Limitations include:
  1. Focus solely on short-term stock market reactions.
  2. Lack of exploration on the long-term effects of environmental CSR.
  3. Challenges in addressing the endogeneity between CSR and firm value or performance.

What does the study aim to examine regarding shareholders and corporations?

This research investigates the sensitivity of shareholders to corporate environmental footprints. It analyzes the stock price movements in response to environmentally responsible or irresponsible behaviors of firms. The focus is on how environmental corporate social responsibility (CSR) impacts shareholder reactions.

How do shareholders react to eco-friendly corporate initiatives according to the study?

According to the findings, shareholders respond positively to the announcement of eco-friendly corporate initiatives. This positive engagement is linked to generating new and competitive resources for firms, contributing to stock price increases.

What is the reaction of shareholders to eco-harmful corporate events as per the study?

The study reveals that shareholders react negatively to announcements related to eco-harmful corporate events. Such actions can lead to wasted resources and potential reputation losses, affecting competitive assets and stock prices.

What external pressures are mentioned that influence environmental CSR?

Several external pressures impacting environmental CSR are discussed:
  1. Increased environmental regulations
  2. Growing media scrutiny/inspection
  3. Enhanced customer sensitivity toward environmental issues
  4. An upswing in shareholder proposals regarding environment-related actions

How has shareholder proposal activity related to environmental CSR changed over time?

Over the study period, the number of shareholder proposals focused on environmental CSR has increased approximately fourfold. This reflects a significant shift in environmental consciousness among shareholders.

What are the implications of external pressures on shareholders' reactions to eco-harmful behavior?

External pressures may intensify negative shareholder reactions to eco-harmful behavior, worsening a company's reputation and affecting customer and partner relationships. This leads to increased penalties for irresponsible actions.

What does the theory propose about the value of environmental CSR over time?

The theory posits that the value of environmental CSR is diminishing over time. As eco-friendly actions become institutionalized, shareholders may offer less reward for such initiatives due to reduced competitive value.

What is the relationship between a company's environmental performance and shareholder reactions to eco-friendly initiatives?

Shareholders of companies with higher environmental performance tend to react less positively to the announcement of eco-friendly initiatives, as they may receive fewer marginal returns from additional green actions.

How do environmental strengths affect shareholder reactions to eco-harmful behavior?

Companies with stronger environmental resources may experience less negative reactions from shareholders regarding eco-harmful behavior. This is due to an insurance-like effect, where environmental strength mitigates concern over occasional negative events.

What is the significance of the cumulative abnormal return (CAR) variable in the study?

CAR measures the stock market's response to environmental corporate news. It provides insight into how announcements regarding eco-friendly or harmful activities influence stock prices over time.

What managerial implications arise from the study's findings regarding environmental CSR?

The findings suggest managers should prioritize effective environmental CSR policies, innovation, and R&D aimed at improving environmental performance to align with shareholders' expectations and long-term objectives.

What limitations does the study acknowledge about its focus?

The study recognizes its limitations by focusing solely on short-term stock market reactions, leaving long-term effects of environmental CSR on shareholder value undiscussed. Additionally, endogeneity issues between CSR and firm performance were noted.

How do changes in institutional conditions impact companies' engagement in environmental CSR?

Changes in institutional conditions are suggested to drive companies toward active engagement in environmental CSR. The institutional theory indicates that firms often align their behaviors with what is most legitimized in their industry.

In what ways has environmental consciousness among shareholders evolved?

Over time, shareholder awareness has evolved, leading to increasing environmental consciousness expressed through heightened proposal activity, consumer preferences, and media attention focused on corporate environmental behavior.

What are the key hypotheses presented in the study?

Key hypotheses include that shareholders:
  1. React positively to eco-friendly events
  2. React negatively to eco-harmful events
  3. Show increasing negative reactions over time to harmful behaviors
  4. Exhibit decreasing positive reactions to eco-friendly initiatives over time

The question on the page originate from the summary of the following study material:

  • A unique study and practice tool
  • Never study anything twice again
  • Get the grades you hope for
  • 100% sure, 100% understanding
Remember faster, study better. Scientifically proven.
Trustpilot Logo