Innovation and competitive advantage - klingebiel and joseph 2016

25 important questions on Innovation and competitive advantage - klingebiel and joseph 2016

What was the focus of the study by Klingebiel and Joseph (2016) regarding entry timing and innovation strategy in feature phones?

This study investigates timing decisions in innovation concerning the mobile handset industry during the feature-phone era. Key findings include:
  • Early movers target greater, uncertain revenue with broader innovation portfolios.
  • Late movers seek more certain revenue with selective portfolios.
  • Timing-strategy alignment impacts performance, not timing alone.

How do early and late movers differ in their investment strategies according to the study?

Early movers adopt strategies to achieve high rewards with a broad array of features, accepting higher risk:
  • Aim: Larger, uncertain returns.
  • Portfolio: Broader, less selective.
Conversely, late movers focus on:
  • Aim: Smaller, certain returns.
  • Portfolio: Narrower, more selective.

What findings did the authors reveal about the timing and feature breadth in their study?

The data show that:
  • Early movers launch more features (0.1% significant) than late movers.
  • This broad approach helps mitigate risks inherent in uncertainty.
  • Late movers prefer refining a few features to ensure effectiveness.
  • Higher grades + faster learning
  • Never study anything twice
  • 100% sure, 100% understanding
Discover Study Smart

How does the timing of a firm's entry correlate with its innovation portfolio selectiveness?

Early movers usually launch a wider array of features amid market uncertainty. They may not focus on selectiveness. In contrast, late movers:
  • Select Features: Based on learning and data analysis.
  • Aim: Avoid mistakes and ensure success with fewer but more effective features.

What do the quantitative results indicate about the relationship between entry timing and performance?

The study's quantitative findings reveal:
  • Entry timing doesn’t directly predict short-term performance.
  • Early movers perform better with broader portfolios.
  • Late movers’ performance is less correlated with portfolio breadth, suggesting a preference for selectiveness.

What propositions were presented regarding strategic fit and performance in the conclusion of the study?

The conclusion outlines key propositions contributing to future research:
  • Proposition 1: Strategic fit between timing and breadth/selectiveness optimizes performance.
  • - 1a: Early movers benefit more from breadth.
  • - 1b: Late movers benefit more from selectiveness.

What does the study by Klingebiel and Joseph (2016) focus on?

The research examines timing decisions firms make regarding innovations in the mobile handset industry, specifically focusing on:
  • Influence of portfolio-level timing preferences
  • Effects on innovation strategies
  • Differences in early and late movers

How do early movers differ from late movers in their innovation strategy?

Early movers adopt strategies that aim for:
  1. Larger, uncertain revenue opportunities
  2. Broader, less selective innovation portfolios
Conversely, late movers target smaller, certain revenue opportunities with narrower, selective portfolios.

What is the significance of timing-strategy alignment according to the study?

Timing-strategy alignment is crucial because:
  • It determines high performance outcomes
  • Affects innovation portfolio success
  • Provides context for understanding timing and performance relationships.

What insights does the study provide for future research?

Future research can explore:
  1. Equifinal configurations proposed
  2. Relationship between timing and performance
  3. Broader/nonselective for early movers and narrow/selective for late movers.

What does the main contribution of the study focus on?

The study contributes by:
  1. Explaining systematic strategic differences among firms with different entry timing
  2. Highlighting the relationship between timing and innovation strategy for high performance.

What is the relationship between entry timing and performance according to the study?

Entry timing does not directly predict performance; instead:
  • A strategic fit between timing and portfolio aspects is crucial.
  • Early movers benefit from breadth, while late movers benefit from selectiveness.

What approach did the authors use in their research?

A hybrid approach combining:
  1. Qualitative methods (interviews)
  2. Quantitative methods (secondary data)
This allowed deeper insights into timing decisions.

In terms of investment strategy, how do early movers act?

Early movers pursue:
  1. Big wins despite frequent failures
  2. A wide set of features
  3. Less selective pressure in their development portfolio.

What strategy do late movers typically engage in regarding features?

Late movers adopt a deliberate strategy focused on:
  1. Refining fewer features
  2. Ensuring precision and effectiveness
  3. Learning from market uncertainties to make selective feature choices.

How does the broader portfolio of early movers compare to that of late movers?

Early movers typically have:
  • A significantly broader portfolio of features
  • Launching more features than late movers, even when size is equal.

What role does market feedback play for late movers?

Late movers utilize market feedback to:
  • Make more informed decisions
  • Reduce risks when selecting features
  • Enhance their selectiveness and overall effectiveness.

What is the baseline proposition of the study?

The baseline proposition states that:
  1. Firms with varying entry-timing positions follow different investment strategies
  2. Early movers seek larger, uncertain returns while late movers aim for smaller, certain returns.

How does the study link timing and selectiveness to performance?

The study emphasizes that:
  • Performance improves with strategic alignment between timing and selectiveness
  • Early movers benefit from breadth, while late movers gain from selectiveness in their portfolios.

What do firm managers consider when making timing decisions?

Managers weigh:
  1. Scale and likelihood of commercial success
  2. Risks of competitive pre-emption
  3. Internal capabilities and market opportunities when setting timing strategies.

What is the significance of a broader feature portfolio for early movers?

A broader feature portfolio allows early movers to:
  1. Mitigate risks associated with uncertainty
  2. Aim for temporary blockbusters to compensate for the higher failure rate.

How do late movers ensure better feature selection?

Late movers emphasize:
  • Selective learning from market dynamics
  • Analyzing competitor products and customer feedback
  • Discriminating which features to pursue to minimize failures.

What are the implications of the study's findings on broader theories of entry timing?

The findings suggest:
  1. A need for a contingency view of entry timing’s performance advantages
  2. Understanding variations in firms' approaches to innovation and pre-emption decisions.

How do early movers and late movers differ in market capture?

Early movers might face:
- Higher average premiums but increased failures.
Late movers typically experience:
- More stable returns with better-controlled failures.

What factors influence firms' decisions on entry timing in the mobile handset industry?

Decisions about entry timing are consciously shaped by various factors, including:
  • Firm's capability proximity to new product markets.
  • Nature of product offerings typical for the firm.
  • Investment uncertainty and competitive pre-emption.
  • Managers' own deliberate choices on beneficial timing.
  • The overall strategic alignment of innovation approaches.

The question on the page originate from the summary of the following study material:

  • A unique study and practice tool
  • Never study anything twice again
  • Get the grades you hope for
  • 100% sure, 100% understanding
Remember faster, study better. Scientifically proven.
Trustpilot Logo