Home / Summaries / Contemporary Approaches in Cultural Sociology / rock-schaap-skin

Race and Ethnicity in Culture - Schaap & Berkers (2019) - Maybe it's skin color

Q: The article Maybe it's ... Skin color (Schaap & Berkens, 2019), examines the degree to which race-ethnicity and gender are important when people classify rock artists. The researchers focussed on implicit and explicit classifications. Can you explain the difference?

Implicit : when it is unconscious and unexpressed. I.e., you classify on race but are not directly aware of it, or don't express it as a criterium. Explicit : when it is conscious and discursive. E.g., 'non-white rockers are not in the canon, so they are inherently more rebellious.'

Q: The article Maybe it's ... Skin color (Schaap & Berkens, 2019), examines intersectionality of people's classification practices of rock artists. What is intersectionality?

Intersectionality looks at how various social identities ( race, gender, class, sexuality, etc.) interact and overlap to create unique experiences of discrimination or privilege for individuals and groups. I.e., it considers that discrimination/privilege cannot be fully understood by looking at a single category of social identity. E.g., While two women might face gender-based discrimination, both women may have a wildly different experience of discrimination as one is black and the other is white.

Q: The article Maybe it's ... Skin color (Schaap & Berkens, 2019), examines the degree to which race-ethnicity and gender are important when people classify rock artists. Can you explain why we could see this as an example of how colour-blind ideology can promote indirect institutional racism?

Colour-blind ideology: Ideology that focusses on the sameness between racial and ethnic groups ('opportunity has no colour') and therefore avoids race-related remarks, and with that ignores the unequal social locations and distinctive histories of racial and ethnic groups. Indirect institutional racism . Because of the colour-blind ideology whiteness is unconsciously constructed as the default category (normal). Because this is ignored, real structural inequality stats hided. Cognitive structure: race is implicitly used to make sense of reality. Whiteness is default for rock, others are deviant.

4 important questions on Race and Ethnicity in Culture - Schaap & Berkers (2019) - Maybe it's skin color

The article Maybe it's ... Skin color (Schaap & Berkens, 2019), examines the degree to which race-ethnicity and gender are important when people classify rock artists.
The researchers focussed on implicit and explicit classifications. Can you explain the difference?

Implicit: when it is unconscious and unexpressed.

I.e., you classify on race but are not directly aware of it, or don't express it as a criterium.

Explicit: when it is conscious and discursive.

E.g., "non-white rockers are not in the canon, so they are inherently more rebellious."

The article Maybe it's ... Skin color (Schaap & Berkens, 2019), examines intersectionality of people's classification practices of rock artists.
What is intersectionality?

Intersectionality looks at how various social identities ( race, gender, class, sexuality, etc.) interact and overlap to create unique experiences of discrimination or privilege for individuals and groups.

I.e., it considers that discrimination/privilege cannot be fully understood by looking at a single category of social identity.
E.g., While two women might face gender-based discrimination, both women may have a wildly different experience of discrimination as one is black and the other is white.

The article Maybe it's ... Skin color (Schaap & Berkens, 2019), examines the degree to which race-ethnicity and gender are important when people classify rock artists.
Why did the researchers think "rock" was an interesting genre to focus on?

Because rock is an unmarked genre.

Although one race is dominantly present in the genre, it is not mentioned or even ignored.
Rock is white, but whiteness does not define rock (i.e., is not a criterium for what rock music is).

The article Maybe it's ... Skin color (Schaap & Berkens, 2019), examines the degree to which race-ethnicity and gender are important when people classify rock artists.

Can you explain why we could see this as an example of how colour-blind ideology can promote indirect institutional racism?

Colour-blind ideology: Ideology that focusses on the sameness between racial and ethnic groups ('opportunity has no colour') and therefore avoids race-related remarks, and with that ignores the unequal social locations and distinctive histories of racial and ethnic groups.
Indirect institutional racism.

Because of the colour-blind ideology whiteness is unconsciously constructed as the default category (normal).
Because this is ignored, real structural inequality stats hided.
Cognitive structure: race is implicitly used to make sense of reality. Whiteness is default for rock, others are deviant.

The question on the page originate from the summary of the following study material:

Contemporary Approaches in Cultural Sociology

View summary

A unique study and practice tool
Never study anything twice again
Get the grades you hope for
100% sure, 100% understanding

Remember faster, study better. Scientifically proven.

Topics that are related to Race and Ethnicity in Culture - Schaap & Berkers (2019) - Maybe it's skin color

Race and Ethnicity in Culture

Race and Ethnicity in Culture - Schaap & Berkers (2019) - Maybe it's skin color

4 important questions on Race and Ethnicity in Culture - Schaap & Berkers (2019) - Maybe it's skin color

The article Maybe it's ... Skin color (Schaap & Berkens, 2019), examines the degree to which race-ethnicity and gender are important when people classify rock artists.The researchers focussed on implicit and explicit classifications. Can you explain the difference?

The article Maybe it's ... Skin color (Schaap & Berkens, 2019), examines intersectionality of people's classification practices of rock artists.What is intersectionality?

The article Maybe it's ... Skin color (Schaap & Berkens, 2019), examines the degree to which race-ethnicity and gender are important when people classify rock artists.Why did the researchers think "rock" was an interesting genre to focus on?

The article Maybe it's ... Skin color (Schaap & Berkens, 2019), examines the degree to which race-ethnicity and gender are important when people classify rock artists.Can you explain why we could see this as an example of how colour-blind ideology can promote indirect institutional racism?

Topics that are related to Race and Ethnicity in Culture - Schaap & Berkers (2019) - Maybe it's skin color